The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

Published on February 5th, 3 A Unipolar World: Lundestad and Tor G.

The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

While different scholars emphasize different facets of this competition, the Cold War was at once an ideological, political, economic, cultural, military, and strategic contest between the United States and its allies on one hand, and the Soviet Union and its allies on the other.

Recent studies have done much to complicate the once dominant bipolar understanding of this struggle. Scholars increasingly, and quite rightly, highlight the many ways in which Asian, African, and Latin American states in particular attempted to transcend the apparent strictures imposed by Soviet-American hostility.

Indeed, our understanding of the Cold War is constantly subject to reinterpretation, revision, and modification, as new evidence, new methodologies, and new actors emerge from obscurity.

There is a vast and continually expanding literature on the Cold War, offering much of value to international-relations scholars. The studies and resources included in this bibliography are designed to guide the new and experienced international-relations researcher through a selection of resources that reveal the myriad complexities, nuances, and contingencies of this seminal and contentious period.

A great deal of this literature analyzes the evolution of the international system in the decades after World War II, while providing insights into policy formulation and diplomacy.

The Cold War was brought about through the U.S. and their disagreement with Stalin, Communism, and how Eastern Europe should be treated, as well the struggle for power with the rocket race and nuclear weapons development. Crucial leaders in these events were Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, and Stalin. Oct 27,  · Watch video · During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the . After reading Toal's Introduction to Part Two that discusses "Cold War Geopolitics" you will need to take the "Cold War Geopolitics" mini quiz before proceeding. Return to Lesson 02 in Canvas and click on the "Cold War Geopolitics" Mini Quiz link.

Scholars have also been particularly interested in questions of responsibility and blame, especially regarding the origins and end of the Cold War. Many questions remain unresolved, and the boundaries of scholarly inquiry are continually expanding, making it an especially rich field of research for new and experienced researchers alike.

General Overviews New students and researchers seeking introductory overviews of the Cold War are extremely well served. A number of studies are particularly well suited to new international-relations students and scholars seeking context and references for their research on the period.

Gaddis b and LaFeber are excellent starting points for those seeking relatively brief and straightforward narrative accounts of the US-Soviet conflict.

Gaddis emphasizes Soviet culpability in his largely orthodox treatment, while LaFeber stresses a greater degree of American responsibility in his revisionist account.

These two studies can be profitably read together and represent two of the best examples of these conflicting interpretations of the Cold War.

Keylor takes a more balanced postrevisionist approach, which sees both sides as bearing some measure of responsibility at different times and in different places. It also ranges widely beyond the simple binary of Cold War conflict.

Leffler and Westad is one of the newest contributions to the field, and certainly one of the best. This collection is highly recommended to all scholars, both new and experienced.

Westad brings together a collection of essays from international-relations scholars and historians that explore a variety of methodological questions, which is especially useful for those interested in theoretical approaches.

Gaddis a is an excellent starting point for students and scholars interested in the evolution of American national-security strategy during this period, while Zubok performs a similar service with regard to the Soviet Union.

Oxford University Press, a. Remains the best strategic-level analysis of American Cold War policies for all researchers. Read in conjunction with LaFeber for alternative analysis. A World of Nations: The International Order since Oxford University Press, Well-written, comprehensive, and balanced history of international relations in the Cold War and post—Cold War period.

Combines a theoretical, chronological, thematic, and regional approach that will orient new researchers in this often complicated era. Ideal introduction for international-relations scholars.

America, Russia, and the Cold War, — Tends to place responsibility on the United States and its policies.

The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

Especially useful for beginning undergraduates and novice researchers. Read in conjunction with Gaddis b for alternative analysis.

The dominance of antagonism during the course of the cold war

The Cambridge History of the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, Oct 27,  · Watch video · During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers.

However, the relationship between the . What role did the Soviet Union play in the course of World War II and the origins of the Cold War? Why did the Soviet-American partnership collapse so quickly?

Cold War History - HISTORY

What were the main Soviet goals at the end of World War . In the Berlin Wall fell, the first of a series of events bringing the period known as the Cold War to an end. From a state of military multipolarity (), the world had progressed to one of bipolarity (), to the current situation of unipolarity.

(1) The Cold War was an attempt of the United States to change the results of the World War II. One of the main results for the Soviet Union was the appearance of the “socialist camp: the number of countries with the similar socialist system.

The emergence of the Cold War is easier to understand if one looks at World War II as the conflict between democracy, fascism, and communism. Conflict between the Soviet Union and the other Allied Powers emerged during the course of World War II. In the Berlin Wall fell, the first of a series of events bringing the period known as the Cold War to an end.

From a state of military multipolarity (), the world had progressed to one of bipolarity (), to the current situation of unipolarity.

The Cold War as a System - Michael Cox